My sources are telling me Talarico is in a mental health facility. His campaign has stopped actively planning events in the vital homestretch of the campaign.

If this is true, this is actually a time to pray for Talarico. We should, of course, savagely mock his smug, awful campaign advisors, by all means…and while yes, of course, this would be disqualifying for Talarico’s aspirations to be a Texas Senator, we must hold empathy for anyone undergoing crisis. Campaigns are brutal, and not everybody is cut out for it. You need very thick skin. As much as I don’t want Talarico anywhere near government, I also don’t want wish him harm, and no political office is worth having a breakdown. His awful advisors are at fault for this. They pushed him to be something he isn’t, and it didn’t work.

I’m praying that this isn’t true, and he’s OK. You want to win these fights on the battlefield of ideas, not the minefield of poor health.

Spencer Pratt, X

AUSTIN, TX — Senate candidate James Talarico suddenly disappeared from the campaign trail last week after Democratic strategists realized that he is James Talarico.

With Democrats holding a shocking lead in statewide Texas races, political operatives pulled Talarico off the campaign, hoping to hide the fact that he is James Talarico.

“The one thing that could sink this campaign is Texans meeting James Talarico,” said Democratic strategist Kelly Hutchins. “He is so friggin’ weird. Have you heard the stuff that comes out of that guy’s mouth? Completely insane, even for us. We believe the winning strategy is to simply keep James Talarico from ever campaigning for James Talarico.”

Mystery surrounded Talarico’s sudden absence during the final month of the campaign, but surveys showed that the strategy was working. “It’s pretty simple. People will vote for James as long as they don’t know who he is,” said pollster Graham Kitchens. “The campaign just has to hide who he is and everything he’s ever said and done. He really is just the worst. But as long as he stays out of view, they’ve got a great shot.”

At publishing time, Talarico had asked his political handlers if the giant padlock on the door of the basement he was being kept in was really necessary.

Babylon Bee

I wonder whether Zohran Mamdani has ever read Shakespeare or sticks mainly to Karl Marx.

If he has ever dabbled in the Bard, he may know the idiom “hoist with his own petard.” In Hamlet, a petard was a crude medieval explosive used to blow open castle gates, and the unlucky engineer was the one launched skyward. That is precisely where this tard finds himself today, lifted by the very cause he weaponized, which now seeks to destroy him.

After the Marxist, maleficent, Muslim mayor of New York City ostentatiously attended an October 7 vigil mourning the Israelis slaughtered that day and the Palestinians killed in the war in Gaza that followed, he was berated, screamed at, and swarmed by his own supporters.

It was a richly delicious irony.

Fully masked Islamist men chased and threatened Hizzoner, essentially branding him a Zionist after loudly protesting the memorial in its entirety.

Honestly, where do these people find the time? If I have a rare evening off, I’m not spending it in New York’s chilly, grimy, nauseatingly loud streets, yelling at strangers through a scarf. But then again, I’m normal.

It didn’t matter to these deranged, daddy-issue-riddled delinquents that Mr. Mamdani looked as though he wanted to attach a suicide vest to himself throughout the ceremony. Nor did it matter that he was the sole invitee to decline a New York screening of the October 7 massacre footage Wednesday evening, opting instead for dinner at the only Palestinian restaurant on the Upper West Side after the vigil. By donating one hour of his life to a semi-Jewish-appearing cause and one sentence to the victims in an otherwise lengthy and pro-Hamas X statement, he earned himself the title of traitor.

There is zero room for error in the pro-Palestine movement. Deviate once from its nefarious expectations, and you’re branded a Zionist. And you’re out.

You can’t sit here anymore, Heather!

All the cool kids agree, starting with the queen bee of the Democratic Socialists of America, Hasan Piker, who complains that Mamdani didn’t offer enough “material concessions to the anti-zionist groups he made promises to while running,” and that the mayor has instead made concessions to Zionists. Ugh! I hate when this couple fights. I hope they can move past this relationship roadblock. Inshallah.

And their youthful useful idiots, who follow these baboons blindly into Babylon, are now parroting the same line.

This keffiyeh kid protester says there’s been a “shift against him in activist spaces.” I love when they say “spaces.” They have a million of them, each one simultaneously safe and aggrieved. P.S. If I ever proclaim I’m a member of a “space,” seek medical attention for me immediately.

The mini socialist, with the charming cleavage tattoo, goes on to say that the shift away from Mamdani is because the spaces have realized he is underperforming on Palestine, the NYPD, surveillance, and the overall protection that he was supposed to deliver to his dutiful cadre. It’s a shame. I, too, thought he would have jihaded the NYPD by now. Total letdown, amirite?

It’s gotta be difficult for this mayor, who has enjoyed the privilege of playing protester in his infinite free time for most of his young adult life, to face the real world, where you can’t simply scream into a microphone all day about the NYPD’s boot being laced by the IDF, or about a genocide that was apparently underway before Hamas ever invaded Israel. Instead, he has to pretend to be mayor for “all” New Yorkers, which means slipping on the “I don’t hate Jews” mask for five minutes. Even that was enough to poke the bear. It doesn’t matter how much he’s fed the bear. The bear will eat him.

He failed the litmus test he helped create, and now he will face the consequences. These people are binary: You’re with them, or you’re against them. And as far as they’re concerned, Mamdani just did the equivalent of donning a yarmulke and chanting from the Torah. He’s officially an establishment Dem. Old news. Washed up on the Democratic death beaches alongside House Minority Leader Hakeem (D-NY) Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). Mamdani? Who even is that? Lost to obscurity, practically a footnote. Is he a Republican now? I forget. Scoot over, Mamdani, the DSA wants a REAL leader, someone like Piker! He flaunts the iconography of communist dictators who killed millions, forgives rapes against those he disagrees with, and would love to see capitalist blood run in the streets. A commie girl’s dream boy.

Mamdanimobster, you built this petard. You planted it at the gate. And now it will end you. Just as the Bolsheviks devoured the liberals, Mensheviks, and Socialist Revolutionaries who cleared their path in 1917, Stalin devoured the Old Bolsheviks who had made him. Just as the Jacobins devoured the Girondins who helped topple the monarchy, the Terror devoured Danton, and finally Robespierre himself. Just as Khomeini’s Islamists devoured the leftists and Mojahedin who had marched beside them against the Shah.

The revolution does not do coalitions. It does purges. You’re no exception.

Chloe Trapanotto, Daily Wire

Well, this is a nuclear bomb directed at companies that abuse the H-1B visa system and the Permanent Labor Certification Program, which converts H-1B visa holders into permanent residents.

Nothing like this has happened before at this scale, although enforcement actions on a much smaller scale have achieved the same goal. 

.@Sonderling47: “I am hereby suspending from the Permanent Labor Certification Program some of the largest IT outsourcing firms in the world — Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini — and also, due to multiple active federal investigations, @USDOL is suspending Microsoft and Adobe from the program.”— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) October 8, 2026

And what is that goal? To protect U.S. workers from abusive companies, mostly focused in the information technology world, which import cheap labor from abroad to replace perfectly capable US workers. 

It’s a huge, growing problem, partly driven by companies seeking cheap labor, and in a program that imports doctors, directly caused by federal subsidies that freeze American medical students out of residency programs here in the United States. As far as I know, the administration hasn’t addressed the latter yet, but this move to stop H-1B visa abuse is a step in the right direction. 

Microsoft came under the spotlight, though several IT outsourcing companies, including Tata, a well-known Indian company, were slammed just as hard. 

The Trump administration is suspending Microsoft and some other companies from seeking permanent residency for foreign workers hired through the H-1B visa program, accusing them of taking advantage of the process so that they could replace American citizens with cheaper labor from abroad.

Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that the tech giant is one of a handful of companies to be barred indefinitely from the Labor Department’s PERM program following an investigation spearheaded by the anti-fraud task force that he chairs.

That probe determined that Microsoft laid off roughly 6,000 American workers last year, while at the same time employing 6,300 non-citizens that it had brought to the US by obtaining H-1B visas for them.

“The H-1B visa is how the people get into the United States in the first place, and then a PERM program is how those employees stay,” Vance said. “There has been no company in the United States, unfortunately, that has abused the system more than Microsoft.”

You’ve likely read more than a little about H-1B visa abuse, and no case is clearer than Microsoft laying off 6000 American workers and replacing them with more foreign workers. For all the talk of labor shortages requiring the importation of more workers, it’s hard to deny that this was pure abuse of a system that was never intended to crush American workers. 

It’s supposed to bring in the Einsteins of the world, who have no American counterpart; it’s not supposed to replace mid-level programmers with equivalent mid-level programmers who cost less. 

Vance downplayed the administration’s decision to punish Microsoft over accusations of fraud on the same day that it hailed the company’s achievements.

“Our message to Microsoft is not that we want to harm your company, it’s that we want your company to thrive, but we want it to thrive by employing and empowering your fellow Americans,” he said. “So we’re going to continue to support Microsoft and have a great relationship with Microsoft, but we’re also going to deny them the ability to apply for these permanent residencies until they show that they are going to get serious about putting American workers first.”

The Labor Department is also indefinitely suspending software firm Adobe and several IT outsourcing firms from the PERM program, meaning that any new or pending requests for permanent residency for their workers will not be considered.

Vance did not lay out any specific steps for the companies to regain access to the process, saying only that it wanted Microsoft and others to “change their behavior, improve their behavior and actually get better.”

Companies have all sorts of ways to subvert the hiring process and claim there are no available American workers. One favorite is to post an obscure ad in a newspaper classifieds that nobody will see, then recruit foreign workers to fill positions that few or no Americans applied for. 

I caught on to this when people started posting photos of such ads on X, wondering why the jobs weren’t on the usual hiring boards. It turns out that this tactic fulfills the letter of the law, but subverts its purpose. I would assume that, in ongoing investigations, this would imply or prove that the companies conspired to avoid hiring Americans, since they made no good-faith effort to hire Americans. I have no idea whether that is enough to prosecute, but it is obviously enough for the administration to hit them with a regulatory nuke. 

Another ZERO: United Health Services in Johnson City, New York. All 14 residents listed in its 2026 entering three-year internal medicine class attended medical school abroad. Nine trained in Pakistan. Its two one-year preliminary interns also attended schools abroad. https://t.co/fNS2ZKEBKh— Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) October 1, 2026

Medical schools and hospitals are hiring a lot of foreign doctors, and Medicare actually pays for the medical education of many of them, too. The idea is to get doctors into underserved areas, but when combined with medical schools’ DEI practices, an awful lot of Americans who should and would enter the medical workforce are frozen out. 

Something changed at Texas Health HEB/Denton. Among its current Internal Medicine residents, graduates of Pakistani medical schools make up: PGY-3: 5 of 20 = 25% PGY-2: 3 of 19 = 16% PGY-1: 13 of 21 = 62% The newest class isn’t just more international, nearly two-thirds of the entire class attended medical school in Pakistan. Maybe this is what happens when an Abbott-appointee simultaneously serves as U.S. coordinator for an initiative of Pakistan’s Ministry of Planning.— Nick Plumb (@PlumbNick) September 26, 2026

This is another example of a loophole in the immigration system that is upending our labor market and kicking Americans out of skilled industries in favor of foreign workers, and even worse, in some areas of the world, the credentials aren’t worth the paper they are printed on because there is so much fraud. 

BREAKING: 97.6% of medical residents at Rochester General Hospital are foreign medical graduates. All of them hired on H1-B/J1 visa. Only 2 Americans got hired out of 82 total residents.— Expose H1B Fraud (@JobsNowPaper) September 26, 2026

I’ve been treated by several foreign doctors, and my experience has been almost universally positive. I’ve had two Indian doctors as specialists, one excellent and the other truly outstanding. I just had an Arab doctor do a biopsy on me and he did an excellent job. He’d been at the hospital almost 20 years, though. 

But that is not the point. The point is that the system shouldn’t be stacked against Americans. I have no problem supplementing American doctors when the number of available Americans is insufficient to meet demand; the problem is when foreign workers substitute for native-born Americans to save a buck. 

In general, the more skilled labor doing necessary work, the better. I don’t believe in the idea of a fixed pie that cannot grow, and just as AI can improve productivity by empowering skilled people to do more without making their lives worse, more doctors in places or specialties where we are short are not inherently bad. 

But that’s only true when the system works as it should, and it doesn’t, though a cynic would say it works as intended. 

If the intent is to give a healthier bottom line to a corporation that is indifferent to the negative effects its decisions have on our communities and country, then it’s time to put them in their place by hitting back.

David Strom, Hotair

We are a nation at war.

Not by our choice, of course; but then, it only takes one country to declare a war. The jihadist Twelvers who run Iran declared war on the United States, and on Israel, and in fact on pretty much the entire world, 47 years ago, and they’ve been at war with the world ever since.

Israel has borne the brunt of it, most of the time, since they are geographically so much closer, and when it came time for us to fully join the fight last year, Israel and the United States became true wartime allies again, collaborating in the noble effort of destroying Iran’s military capabilities while keeping civilian casualties to an absolute minimum.

There are many kinds of allies. There are allies by virtue of being in a historic but largely obsolete commonwealth, like the British Empire is today. There are allies by virtue of geography, next door neighbors forced to work together to defend themselves against a common enemy. There are even unhappy allies by virtue of sharing the same enemy, despite being opposed in every other way, as in the relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union during World War II, created solely because we both found ourselves at war with Germany and Japan.

Our alliance with Israel is like none of these.

Israel is a true friend, not just because we share a common enemy, but because we share common values, common roots, common worldviews, and in many ways, even common histories.

Just as the United States was founded primarily by religious Christians seeking a new and safe homeland, free of persecution by their former governments, modern Israel was largely founded by religious Jews similarly seeking a new and safe homeland, following centuries of persecution elsewhere. (The analogy isn’t perfect, since Israel was originally the home of the Jews, millenia ago, and there has been a continuous Jewish presence there forever, even when the population was sparse, but that difference doesn’t diminish the similarities).

The United States is a republic, a nation of constitutional self-government dedicated to liberty, the ultimate role model nation for the philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, bringing Western Civilization to the Western Hemisphere. And Israel is similarly the role model of self-government in the Middle East, the only functioning republic dedicated to human liberty and Western values in the region.

And Israel was founded in part by settlers from the United States; some of their heads of state and other senior politicians studied or worked here before rising to high office there.

The two nations are united both culturally and economically, sharing Judeo-Christian values and traditions. We were among the first nations to recognize Israel upon its founding in 1948; even our very first free trade agreement, in 1984, was with Israel.

The country is indeed a true friend.

The atrocities of October 7 happened half a world away from us; the horror and sadness took time to sink in.

But that day was also commandeered by our mutual enemies, and our politics have irrevocably changed as a result. The enemies are out in the open now; we see them gaining power, and on election day, we have the chance to take that power away from them.

American politics are no longer what they once were. It’s not just about whether we favor a slight tax hike or a slight tax cut, or whether we favor a new cabinet department or going a certain direction on the Supreme Court.

Today, our elections are about whether we still side with innocent victims or if we want to support their oppressors… whether we still stand for Western Civilization and Judeo-Christian values or if we want to enable sharia law and the rape culture and violence that it brings… whether we still support sister countries like Israel, with fair elections and parliamentary governance, or if we support terrorism and islamic theocracies.

We pray for the souls of the victims of that tragic fall day in 2023, and for the friends and families who mourn them.

And we also pray for our own wisdom, here in the USA, as we seek the guidance of Divine Providence in making the right choices in the midterm elections that are fast upon us.

The atrocities of October 7 happened half a world away from us; the horror and sadness took time to sink in.

But that day was also commandeered by our mutual enemies, and our politics have irrevocably changed as a result. The enemies are out in the open now; we see them gaining power, and on election day, we have the chance to take that power away from them.

American politics are no longer what they once were. It’s not just about whether we favor a slight tax hike or a slight tax cut, or whether we favor a new cabinet department or going a certain direction on the Supreme Court.

Today, our elections are about whether we still side with innocent victims or if we want to support their oppressors… whether we still stand for Western Civilization and Judeo-Christian values or if we want to enable sharia law and the rape culture and violence that it brings… whether we still support sister countries like Israel, with fair elections and parliamentary governance, or if we support terrorism and islamic theocracies.

We pray for the souls of the victims of that tragic fall day in 2023, and for the friends and families who mourn them.

And we also pray for our own wisdom, here in the USA, as we seek the guidance of Divine Providence in making the right choices in the midterm elections that are fast upon us.

The atrocities of October 7 happened half a world away from us; the horror and sadness took time to sink in.

But that day was also commandeered by our mutual enemies, and our politics have irrevocably changed as a result. The enemies are out in the open now; we see them gaining power, and on election day, we have the chance to take that power away from them.

American politics are no longer what they once were. It’s not just about whether we favor a slight tax hike or a slight tax cut, or whether we favor a new cabinet department or going a certain direction on the Supreme Court.

Today, our elections are about whether we still side with innocent victims or if we want to support their oppressors… whether we still stand for Western Civilization and Judeo-Christian values or if we want to enable sharia law and the rape culture and violence that it brings… whether we still support sister countries like Israel, with fair elections and parliamentary governance, or if we support terrorism and islamic theocracies.

We pray for the souls of the victims of that tragic fall day in 2023, and for the friends and families who mourn them.

And we also pray for our own wisdom, here in the USA, as we seek the guidance of Divine Providence in making the right choices in the midterm elections that are fast upon us.

The atrocities of October 7 happened half a world away from us; the horror and sadness took time to sink in.

But that day was also commandeered by our mutual enemies, and our politics have irrevocably changed as a result. The enemies are out in the open now; we see them gaining power, and on election day, we have the chance to take that power away from them.

American politics are no longer what they once were. It’s not just about whether we favor a slight tax hike or a slight tax cut, or whether we favor a new cabinet department or going a certain direction on the Supreme Court.

Today, our elections are about whether we still side with innocent victims or if we want to support their oppressors… whether we still stand for Western Civilization and Judeo-Christian values or if we want to enable sharia law and the rape culture and violence that it brings… whether we still support sister countries like Israel, with fair elections and parliamentary governance, or if we support terrorism and islamic theocracies.

We pray for the souls of the victims of that tragic fall day in 2023, and for the friends and families who mourn them.

And we also pray for our own wisdom, here in the USA, as we seek the guidance of Divine Providence in making the right choices in the midterm elections that are fast upon us.

Copyright 2026 John F. Di Leo

When NBC sent Tony Dungy packing, they said it was a youthful revamp of Football Night In America. The former NFL head coach and analyst for over 17 years thinks something else had to do with it.

The two time Super Bowl winner (one as a coach, one as a player) was a staple of NBC’s Sunday Night Football across two decades. He brought expertise and experience to the network’s pregame, halftime and postgame shows… that is until NBC wanted to go a different way.

In an interview with Sage Steele, Dungy said that the writing was on the wall when he got fired by NBC a couple of months before the 2026-27 season was set to begin:

“I kind of knew that was going to be the case, but then they came to me and Rodney and said, you know, they wanted to get a little younger and change the voices and they appreciated what we had done. But they were moving on and reshaping the show. So it was tough, but that’s happened before in my football career, and it happened there.”

The changing of voices and the “getting younger” motivation was how NBC framed moving on from Dungy and Rodney Harris, but the former NFL head coach thinks his talk about religion and his opposition of abortion.

When Steele asked him if he thought his personal views and his faith had anything to do with him being fired by NBC, he didn’t tip toe around with his answer. He stated that NBC knew who he was as a person from the jump, and seemed to be okay with his opinions… until they weren’t:

“There are some things that in TV especially, they want you to be careful because they want to attract everybody. They want to have an audience of everyone. They don’t always appreciate you speaking about your faith.

But for me, I’m always going to do that, and I’m going to try to do it in a respectful way. But people are going to know that I’m a Christian. So that part is never going to leave. I am pro-life, and I’m not gonna be ashamed to say that.”

That being said, Dungy didn’t go as far to say that NBC fired him because of his outspokenness about his faith.

Steele inquired with the former analyst if he thinks that was the real reasoning behind NBC’s decision, and he denied answering that while also saying that the Lord must have something different for him at this stage in his career:

“I don’t know. I don’t know. And it really doesn’t matter. I look at it as I was there 17 years and had some great times and great relationships. The Lord has something different…

I was pretty sure it was, you know, that there were things that they didn’t want me to talk about, and we had a good understanding. They knew who I was when I got hired, and it is what it is.”

Quinn Eaton

He’s supposed to give Texas Republicans a run for their money in the U.S. Senate race. Ken Paxton is supposed to lose, if you believe the polling. So, where the hell is Democrat James Talarico? He’s been missing for almost two weeks. No, it’s not an Unsolved Mysteries episode, but politically, he’s been MIA from the campaign trail in a race where Democrats can’t have their people running silent and deep. Is it because we learned earlier this month that Talarico is a Marxist? Where is this guy (via PJ Media):

Talarico’s last public sighting in Texas came on Saturday, Sept. 26, more than a week ago. He then left for a fundraising trip to New York City, where the VIP dinner ran $27,000 a plate. The guest list included a filmmaker who called America a “s***hole” and a group that advocates child sex change surgeries.

The absences piled up from there. Talarico skipped his in-person Sept. 30 speech to the U.S. Hispanic Business Council in the Rio Grande Valley and joined virtually from a hotel instead. The explanation attendees got was, “His staff says he’s ill and was unable to travel.” During that remote appearance, Talarico said he had to seek treatment at an urgent care clinic in Dallas, and social media users have disputed that timeline.

Then came the recycled footage. On Friday, Oct. 2, the campaign posted video from a Feb. 22 rally, held before Talarico had even won the Democrat nomination, and tried to pass it off as current.

Paxton’s campaign is now requesting proof of life in a tongue-in-cheek statement today, wondering the location of “Low-T Jimmy.”

The Paxton campaign is officially requesting proof of life, including: A video of James Talarico holding a newspaper dated today The flight he took home from his New York fundraisers, which occurred on the very same night he allegedly went to an urgent care in Dallas A doctor’s note from the Dallas urgent care he allegedly visited

“Low-T Jimmy appears to be having a full-blown mental Tala-freak-out on the national stage. We have a simple request: proof of life,” said Madison Cercy, campaign spokeswoman. “James Talarico wants to represent 31 million Texans in the U.S. Senate, but for 12 days, he’s hidden from every one of them. There’s a reason they call it ‘Texas Tough,’ and it’s not because Texans hide at the first sign of trouble. If James Talarico is too fragile to face Texans, he has no business asking for their vote.”

What a moniker, but yes, Talarico. Where are you?

Matt Vespa, Townhall

Widely condemned by fellow Democrats in Pennsylvania and beyond for his outspokenness, Sen. John Fetterman nonetheless would be a favorite among Republicans if he switched parties and sought the GOP nomination when he’s up for reelection in 2028.

A just-completed Quinnipiac poll shows Fetterman with a strong 72% favorable rating among Pennsylvania Republicans. Only 19% view him unfavorably, while 7% have no opinion.

Those numbers have fueled speculation that Fetterman could announce a switch to the Republican Party following the November elections.

Such a move could prove crucial for Senate Republicans, particularly if Democrats gain the four seats needed to reach the magic 51 required for a majority and control of the chamber.

If Fetterman then crossed the aisle to join the GOP, the Senate would be evenly divided between the two parties, leaving Vice President JD Vance to cast tie-breaking votes. That would give the GOP control of the Senate.

Fetterman has good reason to consider switching. The latest poll shows his standing among Democrats is dramatically different.

Quinnipiac found that only 13% of Pennsylvania Democrats view the senator favorably, while 69% have an unfavorable opinion of him. An additional 16% have no opinion.

For more than a year, Fetterman — who was widely considered a liberal in the mold of Bernie Sanders when he was elected to the Senate in 2022 — has been a proverbial thorn in the side of fellow Democrats in Pennsylvania and Washington.

He has called the Democratic brand “toxic” and voted to confirm most of President Donald Trump’s nominees.

Most significantly, he has denounced fellow Democrats over what he considers their increasingly hostile stance toward Israel and embrace of antisemites, plus has flown the Israeli flag outside his home.

Fetterman also has refused to personally attack Trump and has criticized fellow Democrats who do.

“If you’re rooting against the president, you are rooting against the nation, and I’m not ever going to be where I want a president to fail,” Fetterman has said. “So country first!”

Of course, if Fetterman made the jump to the GOP, he could face some obstacles.

Fetterman remains decidedly left of center on cultural issues, ranging from LGBTQ rights to abortion — positions that could turn off many Republican primary voters.

Fetterman has said publicly he has no plans to switch parties.

But that’s now.

“Right now, no. I think Republicans are having an affair with him,” former GOP Rep. Melissa Hart of Pennsylvania, a stalwart conservative, told Newsmax.

“But they would not marry him.”

But Fetterman may decide to jump anyway, a decision he can make after the election when the Senate lines are clearer.

John Gizzi is chief political columnist and White House correspondent for Newsmax. For more of his reports, Click Here Now.

Newsmax

For decades, Palestinians have commemorated the Israeli declaration of independence in 1948 as their “nakba,” a word that means ‘disaster’ in Arabic. That disaster resulted from the refusal of Arabs to accept the UN partition plan that made Israel a Jewish state, and five Arab countries attempted to eradicate Israel instead. The Israelis prevailed in that war, triggering massive displacement as Israel expelled Arabs from their country in response to the invasion. In the years since, as Arabs plotted wars against Israel, the Israelis have prevailed and punished their enemies, who insist that the lands of Israel belong to the colonists instead of the Israelis. 

Also for decades, the Israelis have attempted to resolve the conflict through diplomatic means. The US and the Saudis pushed Israel into concessions in talks led by Bill Clinton that would have created a Palestinian state on 98 percent of the land they demanded. Instead, Yasser Arafat declared an intifada, and the idea of a two-state solution began to crumble to the reality of Palestinian maximalism. 

Nearly thirty years after Arafat scotched the deal and angered everyone, nothing has changed except Israel’s openness to Palestinian statehood. Hamas’ massacres three years ago put an end to any peace efforts in Israel and led to Israel deciding to finally fight Hamas and Hezbollah to a complete end of the decades-long conflict. Until then, the pattern of 1948 has constantly repeated itself: Arabs attack Israel, Israel responds, Arabs play the victim in the wars they start. 

Did October 7 break that pattern? It certainly did in Israel, and to a lesser extent in Washington, D.C. And now it might have finally broken the pattern for some Palestinians who have watched Hamas turn Gaza into a terrorist redoubt and continually provoke Israel into military responses. Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib writes at The Free Press that October 7 is the true “nakba,” and that the Palestinian cause will likely never recover from it:

As the grim third anniversary of October 7 befalls a decimated Gaza Strip, the state of the discourse among many in the so-called “pro-Palestine” movement remains as embarrassing, dismal, and disastrous as it was when Hamas initiated the attack in 2023. Over the past three years, I have seen countless posts by self-described Zionists criticizing the conduct of Israel’s government, the behavior of Israeli officials, and the excesses of the Israeli reaction to October 7. And yet, I have struggled to see even a dozen posts by “pro-Palestine” activists, advocates, or organizations explicitly condemning Hamas for triggering the most catastrophic chapter in contemporary Palestinian history.

And let’s be clear: That’s exactly what this is. Three years after October 7, the Palestinian people face their greatest crisis of the modern era.

I begin on the ground, in Gaza itself. The majority of Gaza’s buildings are partially or fully destroyed. Tens of thousands have lost their lives, including entire families wiped out by ferocious Israeli bombardment. People will argue to the moon and back about who was ultimately responsible for the level of devastation in Gaza. I personally believe Israel killed far too many civilians, including dozens of my own family members. Israeli air strikes destroyed both of my childhood homes. I will never not be angry or upset about this.

But I will also forever be furious at the fact that Gaza would still be standing had Hamas simply kept its terrorists at home on October 7. I will forever be rageful at the fact that Hamas not only weaponized every aspect of Gaza’s infrastructure but also held Israeli hostages in a manner that was inevitably going to invite more devastation and suffering for Palestinian civilians. I will forever be resentful of the useful idiots who ignored Hamas’s sadistic tactics, hiding behind vacuous appeals to “international law” despite there being no legal framework to justify a terrorist group entrenching itself in medical facilities, educational spaces, markets, and areas meant to shelter the displaced.

And while the West wants to keep up the pattern of blaming Israel for the conflict, Akhatib offers a much more blunt and honest assessment:

Today, despite Gaza receiving more aid and development money per capita during the nearly two decades under Hamas’s rule than any other conflict zone in the world, the West does not blame the terrorist group for the territory’s suffering; they blame Israel. They ignore Hamas’s deliberate and willful choice to militarize Gaza’s society and infrastructure for perpetual warfare against Israel; they overlook multiple opportunities presented to Gaza to develop an airport, a seaport, and economic projects; and they continue to sacrifice a nation-building agenda in favor of perpetuating Hamas’s “resistance” narrative.

Say, where did all of that development money go in Gaza? It went underground, as my Salem colleague Erin Molan discovered, both figuratively and literally. Hamas used the deluge of Western cash to build a fortified terror base for the purpose of annihilating Israel, and they built openly and defiantly under the noses of Western leaders who rush to blame Israel. This is what Western idiocy and moral inversion wrought:

INSIDE GAZA’S TERROR TUNNELS@Erin_Molan goes deep beneath Gaza and inside a Hamas tunnel near the Israeli border — one the IDF discovered just eight months ago.

Inside: commanders’ living quarters, blast doors, weapons storage, and tunnels running beneath the homes, schools, and hospitals of civilians above.

It’s the same network where Israeli hostages were held — some for more than a year.

And IDF commanders say they’ve barely scratched the surface.

The full video is available now: https://salemnewschannel.com/watch/under-gaza-oct-7th-anniversary-special-6ac5a5abc4692283a12ed718

pic.twitter.com/BAbVoF3fBw— Salem News Channel (@WatchSalemNews) October 7, 2026

The only genocide at hand in Gaza is the one Hamas plotted for Israel and the Jews, and which it launched on October 7, 2023. Gazans may or may not support Hamas now, but they celebrated it as a national victory three years ago, and not a single Gazan did anything to free or assist the 250-plus hostages Hamas hid among them. This war is their war, and just because that war went badly for them does not absolve them of responsibility for it.  p>This is the Nakba that Palestinians suffered because they created it – and that’s been true of every Nakba since 1948.

Ed Morrisey, Hotair

The results of the recent Palestinian student council elections are a clear warning to Israel, the United States and the World.

Bassam Tawil

Palestinians have once again shown that their real heroes, sadly, are those who carry out terrorist attacks against Jews and seek the elimination of Israel.

In May, student council elections for student councils were held at the two most important Palestinian universities in the West Bank: An-Najah University in Nablus and Birzeit University north of Ramallah, the de facto capital of the Palestinians. The two major student lists that ran in the elections are affiliated with Hamas, the terrorist organization controlling the Gaza Strip, and Fatah, the ruling faction headed by Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas.

The election results were no surprise to those familiar with the general sentiments among Palestinians: the Hamas-affiliated lists won most of the seats. For the 87-year-old Abbas and his Fatah faction, this was not only humiliating, but also a reminder that when it comes to dealing with Israel, many Palestinians prefer terrorism over diplomacy.

The election campaigns and debates at the universities focused mostly on the relationship between the Palestinians and Israel.

The students affiliated with Hamas, whose charter openly calls for the elimination of Israel, boasted that their group continues to carry out terrorist attacks in which Jews are killed or wounded. These students ridiculed their rivals in Fatah for not carrying out enough terrorist attacks against Jews.

The Hamas-affiliated students also condemned the Fatah-dominated P.A. for conducting security coordination with Israeli security forces in the West Bank. Any form of cooperation with Israel, they argued, is tantamount to treason.

The underlying message the Hamas-affiliated lists sent to the thousands of students at the two campuses was: Vote for us because we explicitly and unreservedly uphold the armed struggle against Israel and promise to continue the jihad (holy war) to murder Jews and replace Israel with a genocidal Islamist state, free of non-Muslims.

During election rallies at the two university campuses, Hamas supporters used banners and photos glorifying Palestinian terrorists such as senior Hamas members Mohammed Dief and Musab Shtayyeh, who are wanted by Israel for their roles in a series of terrorist attacks, including shootings and suicide bombings.

When the Hamas-affiliated Islamic Bloc learned that it had won the elections at Birzeit University on May 24, it announced that Shtayyeh, currently being held in P.A. custody for unknown reasons, will serve as “honorary president” of the student council.

Now that the two most important Palestinian university student councils are controlled by Hamas, the question is whether it would be a good idea to hold long overdue presidential and parliamentary elections for the P.A. in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The answer, unfortunately, is “no”—and certainly not under the current circumstances, where a majority of Palestinians are saying that they would vote for Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh if and when new P.A. presidential elections were held.

It also would not be a particularly good idea to hold general elections in the West Bank and Gaza Strip at a time when a majority of Palestinians are voicing support for an “armed intifada” (uprising) against Israel.

More than 70% of Palestinians, according to a public opinion poll conducted the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey, support the terrorist attack in which brothers, Hallel Yaniv, 21, and Yagel Yaniv, 19, were cold-bloodedly murdered in March as they drove through the Palestinian town of Huwara on their way home. The poll also found that 68% of Palestinians support the formation of terror groups, such as the Lions’ Den, to attack and murder Jews.

Hamas is correct when it says that the results of the elections at the two universities are proof that most Palestinians support terrorism against Israel. Hamas said in a statement:

“This [Hamas] victory sends a clear message about the rising popularity of the resistance [against Israel]… The victory reaffirms our people’s adherence to the option of resistance.”

To be clear, when Hamas talks about the “resistance,” it is referring to various forms of terrorism, including suicide bombings, shootings, stabbings, car-rammings and rocket attacks.

Zakaria Abu Muammar, a senior Hamas official, said the victory of his group’s supporters at the universities “reflects the Palestinian youths’ confidence in Hamas and its plans.”

In case it was not clear what Hamas’s plans are, it is worth reading the group’s covenant, published in 1988 and which remains unchanged and as relevant as ever.

Article 11 of the covenant, for instance, underlines the strategies and methods of Hamas:

“The Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas] believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Muslim generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered; it, or any part of it, should not be given up. Neither a single Arab country nor all Arab countries, neither any king or president … neither any organization nor all of them, be they Palestinian or Arab, possess the right to do that.”

Article 13 of the Hamas covenant urges Muslims to wage jihad on Israel and reject any peace initiatives:

“There is no solution for the Palestinian issue except through jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.”

The victory of the Hamas-affiliated lists at the two Palestinian universities in the West Bank should serve as a warning not only to Mahmoud Abbas, but also to the international community, especially the Biden administration, whose representatives continue to promote the delusional and dangerous idea of a “two-state solution.”

It is a dangerous idea because it will lead to the establishment of a Hamas-controlled state next to Israel. Like the Gaza Strip, this state too would be used by Iran and its terror proxies as a launching pad to attack Israel.

It is time for the Biden administration, the European Union and the United Nations to wake up and see with their own eyes that the only solution sought by a majority of Palestinians is one that would deliberately lead to the elimination of Israel. The university students who voted for Hamas have endorsed Hamas’s call for jihad and terrorism against Israel. They have endorsed Hamas’s argument that Israel has no right to exist.

They have also endorsed the argument that no Palestinian or Arab leader is entitled to make any concessions to Israel.

The victory of Hamas supporters in the university elections is yet another reminder of how Palestinians have been raised to hate Israel and glorify those who murder Jews. For generations, Palestinian leaders have been poisoning the hearts and minds of their people against Israel and Jews. The high regard of Palestinian university students for an Islamist group such as Hamas is a natural consequence of this inter-generational hate-fest.

The officials in the Biden administration, European Union and United Nations who continue to talk about the need for a “two-state solution” are actually advocating the creation of another Hamas-led state, like Islamic State, this time in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem. A similar state already exists in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, and is used as a launching pad to fire rockets into Israel.

The results of the recent university elections are a clear indication—and warning—that if all of the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem were ever handed over to the exclusive control of the P.A., they too would end up in the hands of Hamas, whether through elections or a violent and bloody coup like the one that took place in the Gaza Strip in 2007.

Hamas staged a coup, overthrew the P.A. and seized control of the entire Gaza Strip just a year after winning the P.A. parliamentary elections.

By voting for Hamas once again, Palestinians are sending a message to the world that they are determined to pursue terrorism and violence against Israel.

They are also sending a warning to Abbas and other Palestinian leaders not to make peace with Israel or work with it in any way, or else they will be treated as traitors—further proof, as if it were needed, that the Palestinians have yet again chosen violence, terrorism and misery rather than a bright, promising future, a better economy, and prosperity for their young.

Originally published by the Gatestone Institute.