A reporter asked President Trump about Texas’ incoming Democrat governor Gina Hinojosa.

Texas turned blue, blue, blue on Tuesday night.

Governor Greg Abbott was unseated by Democrat Rep. Gina Hinojosa.

Abbott has served as Texas’ governor since 2015.

Gina Hinojosa is a far-left, open borders radical.

Per Fox News:

Gina Hinojosa has called on Gov. Abbott to end state and local cooperation with ICE & she can order that on day one.

Hinojosa voted against the 2017 SB 4 as a TX state rep. The bill was essentially a sanctuary cities ban and required TX law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers. She then voted against another SB 4 in 2023, which made it a state crime to cross illegally into Texas.

Understand the implications of what happened in Texas last night.

Gina Hinojosa has called on Gov. Abbott to end state & local cooperation with ICE & she can order that on day one.

Hinojosa voted against the 2017 SB 4 as a TX state rep. The bill was essentially a sanctuary cities ban and required TX law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers. She then voted against another SB 4 in 2023, which made it a state crime to cross illegally into Texas.

Should there be another border crisis in coming years, there will likely be no resistance from Texas at the border. No Texas DPS, no TX National Guard, no razor wire or water buoys, and no Operation Lone Star, which Hinojosa called a “dog and pony show” and “political theater”.

Remember when 15,000 Haitians surged illegally into Del Rio, TX in 2021 under the international bridge? That was only stopped because Texas DPS responded on Abbott’s orders and physically blocked further crossings by lining up their cruisers to form a wall. The Biden Border Patrol was caught off guard and offered almost no resistance, except for some horseback agents who were falsely slandered for “whipping”.

Additionally, because Republicans failed to pass any legislation codifying President Trump’s border security measures, if Dems take the White House in 2028, that Dem president could, if he/she wants to, reverse every single Trump border security policy immediately upon taking office because they were all done at the executive level, and they can order Border Patrol to go back to a passive catch & release policy like we saw under Biden.

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) November 4, 2026

A reporter asked President Trump if he is going to reinforce the border since Gina Hinojosa is removing state man power.

“I’m sure they’ll continue my policy and if they don’t continue my policy? I will!” Trump said.

President Trump spoke with reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday after he signed an Executive Order making the Oval Office a national monument to restrict future presidents from demolishing the space.

A reporter asked President Trump about Texas’ incoming Democrat governor Gina Hinojosa.

Texas turned blue, blue, blue on Tuesday night.

Governor Greg Abbott was unseated by Democrat Rep. Gina Hinojosa.

Abbott has served as Texas’ governor since 2015.

Gina Hinojosa is a far-left, open borders radical.

Per Fox News:

Gina Hinojosa has called on Gov. Abbott to end state and local cooperation with ICE & she can order that on day one.

Hinojosa voted against the 2017 SB 4 as a TX state rep. The bill was essentially a sanctuary cities ban and required TX law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers. She then voted against another SB 4 in 2023, which made it a state crime to cross illegally into Texas.

Understand the implications of what happened in Texas last night.

Gina Hinojosa has called on Gov. Abbott to end state & local cooperation with ICE & she can order that on day one.

Hinojosa voted against the 2017 SB 4 as a TX state rep. The bill was essentially a sanctuary cities ban and required TX law enforcement to cooperate with ICE detainers. She then voted against another SB 4 in 2023, which made it a state crime to cross illegally into Texas.

Should there be another border crisis in coming years, there will likely be no resistance from Texas at the border. No Texas DPS, no TX National Guard, no razor wire or water buoys, and no Operation Lone Star, which Hinojosa called a “dog and pony show” and “political theater”.

Remember when 15,000 Haitians surged illegally into Del Rio, TX in 2021 under the international bridge? That was only stopped because Texas DPS responded on Abbott’s orders and physically blocked further crossings by lining up their cruisers to form a wall. The Biden Border Patrol was caught off guard and offered almost no resistance, except for some horseback agents who were falsely slandered for “whipping”.

Additionally, because Republicans failed to pass any legislation codifying President Trump’s border security measures, if Dems take the White House in 2028, that Dem president could, if he/she wants to, reverse every single Trump border security policy immediately upon taking office because they were all done at the executive level, and they can order Border Patrol to go back to a passive catch & release policy like we saw under Biden.

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) November 4, 2026

A reporter asked President Trump if he is going to reinforce the border since Gina Hinojosa is removing state man power.

“I’m sure they’ll continue my policy and if they don’t continue my policy? I will!” Trump said.

Cristina Laila, Gateway Pundit

If modern medicine invented a single pill that could slash cardiovascular disease, blunt cognitive decline, lower systemic inflammation, and add a decade of vitality to your lifespan, pharmaceutical companies would charge $1,000 a month for it.

Yet the most potent prescription for living past ninety costs nothing, requires no gym membership, and can be filled right on your neighbor’s front porch.

Over the last two decades, researchers studying the world’s “Blue Zones”—pockets across the globe where people routinely live vibrant, active lives past 100—scrambled to uncover the physiological formula.

At first glance, their diets seem completely contradictory.

In Loma Linda, California, the long-lived Seventh-day Adventists are strict vegetarians who shun alcohol and tobacco entirely. Yet across the Atlantic on the Greek island of Ikaria, centenarians drink dark, unpasteurized red wine daily and feast on boiled wild dandelion greens (you can find organic at Publix). In Okinawa, Japan, elders thrive on soy, sweet potatoes, and sea vegetables. Meanwhile, in the mountains of Sardinia, shepherds live on Cannonau wine, sourdough, and rich pecorino cheese from their own sheep.

So, what is the common thread that laces them all together? Is it being a teetotaling vegetarian, drinking mountain wine, or eating bitter greens?

None of the above. The secret isn’t what sits on the plate—it’s who sits at the table. The unifying biological driver across every single Blue Zone is radical, daily human connection.

When I visit my Greek island of Ithaka, I see it immediately. Elders do not isolate themselves behind drawn blinds staring at television screens. They walk down cobblestone lanes, argue over politics at the local kafenio, banter with merchants, and share their meals. If an unruly preschooler runs wild through the alley, any elder within reach will readily correct them—because everyone has a stake in the community.

From a physiological perspective, chronic isolation is an emergency. The human brain perceives loneliness as a primitive physical threat, triggering the sympathetic nervous system. Cortisol surges, blood pressure climbs, vascular walls inflame, and immune defense falters. From a psychological sense, you spiral down. Epidemiological data by Julianne Holt-Lunstad confirms that chronic social isolation carries a mortality risk equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day—deadlier than obesity and more damaging than physical inactivity.

When you share a belly laugh, make eye contact, or swap stories with a neighbor, you halt that descent. Your pituitary gland floods your system with oxytocin. Arterial walls relax, restorative parasympathetic tone takes over, and your vascular system gets an immediate reprieve.

You don’t have to cross the Atlantic or adopt a monk’s diet to claim these benefits:

• Skip the self-checkout: Look the cashier in the eye, say good morning, and exchange a friendly sentence.

• Revive the porch habit: Invite an old friend or neighbor over for coffee. Real-time eye contact shifts your nervous system in ways a text message never will.

• Anchor to a circle: A church group, a volunteer crew, or a regular lunch table provides the cognitive and emotional scaffolding that keeps aging brains sharp.

You will find commentators inserting their own bias on the longevity secret in Blue Zones, or philosophizing about Dan Buettner’s “Power 9” which describes in more detail what I say here.

But let’s strip away the clinical pretension and call it what it is—mingling. And everyone knows how to do it.

Nikos Vachos

“Communism is terrible. But democratic socialism is cool.” Good grief. That’s like saying, “Murder and theft are terrible. But if a majority vote to murder and rob me — well, that’s cool.”

The stupidity is too ignorant to excuse any longer. There are no more words.

OK, Democrats and Socialists … It’s Your Show. Provide Unprecedented Prosperity– and give it to us NOW!

So what will Democrats propose in the new Congress? What steps will they recommend — even if President Trump will not sign them — in order to bring about the “affordability” that millions demanded and expected the government to provide them? What prices are considered affordable, and what prices are not? Isn’t affordability a subjective term? Democrats — especially socialists — are all about redistribution. They’re not really concerned with how something is produced. They take production for granted; they take supply for granted. They just get the products (already produced) to the parties they consider most deserving. How will this work? Even in theory? America, unlike past socialist countries, already has a vast, mass productive process underway. Generations of free markets brought this about. Now we’re no longer to be a free market country. Who will do the producing? Simply under orders — from Mamdani, AOC or some equivalent? How will this be codified into law?It should be interesting. Millions of voters out there — most of whom don’t consider themselves “socialist” — want the subjectively defined value of “affordability,” and they want it like yesterday. They want the best of everything (like free markets provided) — and they want it free, cheap and NOW. Better than ever … only much cheaper. Democrats had better deliver.

Socialism stops production. When the equivalent of postal employees take over the work now done by Amazon, grocery chains, clothing chains and countless small businesses, you grind production to a halt. Profit is evil, you say? OK, then. Remove self-interest and try running the 21st century like the post office. Or the highways.

Socialism slows or stops production and lowers the cost of everything for “affordability.” Very soon, the supply dries up. But there’s nothing to incentivize production. Remove the capital from capitalism, and you get your precious socialism. That’s why they’re eating dogs and cats in Venezuela and Cuba. Old Soviet Russia and Maoist China were no better.

WHAT IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU’RE VOTING FOR? Fools. Fools, all of you. Affordability will be the least of your concerns.

If the 1940s in America produced the “Greatest Generation,” then what do we make of today’s generation? The people who vote the Bill of Rights into oblivion for the sake of a few pennies less for gas and groceries. The people who cheer calling for the execution of Elon Musk, the only major innovator of the 21st Century so far. The people who cheered Charlie Kirk’s execution.

Whatever we are living in, it’s not the Greatest Generation. I feel no shame or embarrassment. My self-esteem does not come from the time I was born, something I did not choose. Actually, my self-esteem is high for my capacity to see through MOUNDS AND MOUNDS OF CRAP destroying the world when so many appear to be brainwashed or brain-dead. I am grateful to myself, and a few significant others, for enabling the most precious capacity available to any human being : rational thought.

The only thing I feel is tremendously sad that so many better people, in the 1940s and before, once created something so great and special in this nation — something now being squandered by snowflakes and pompous little pricks and loony Karens incapable of appreciating what they’re losing.

If Texas is gone, America is over. Your fellow voting citizens are not your friends. They’re either bad people, or incomprehensibly stupid. In the end, the result is the same. The majority have given a nationwide landslide not to “Democrats” — but to actual totalitarians. It’s impossible to overstate what a disaster this is. Within two or three years, and maybe less, you will see. It’s still too soon for it all to sink in. This is really, really bad.

Texas will be blue forever now. Consider the facts. The new Democratic governor will open the borders and Texas will become the new California, or worse. Migrants will be hooked on free crappy schools, free crappy medical care, guaranteed income pittance, and all the rest. They will vote accordingly. In future presidential races, Texas will be in the Democratic column as assuredly as New York and California. Ohio may also. Georgia likely will. The Carolinas are endangered. DeSantis is right. Given the policies that WILL happen in Texas and Ohio alone, Democrats now have a permanent lock on the White House. It’s really over. Whatever we do going forward, we need a new paradigm. Get out of the past. If you love freedom, you must prepare to fight for it post-America. It’s just reality.

Thirty years ago, a kindred spirit said to me — only half joking — “If we’re going to have socialism in America, can we just get it over with?” For generations, America has gone back and forth, moving towards socialism (Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Obama), and away from it (Reagan, Trump). And at other times, in self-contradictory circles both toward socialism and capitalism at the same time (Eisenhower, Nixon, the Bushes, Bill Clinton).

Now, we have elected a Party that truly will be The Party. Even Republicans (J.D. Vance is the first, after the Bushes) are starting to jump ship to be at the cool kids’ table. In the blink of an eye, Texas — a hugely Republican, economically thriving state just two years ago — is as blue as California and New York. It’s like being in the middle of a dystopian novel. There is nowhere else to flee. Maybe Florida. But even there the margins of the non- Communist, non-Muslim candidates were shockingly small.

That’s it. That’s all that’s left of America. The Republicans didn’t deserve high praise. We all know that. But to vote and cheer for a cross dressing, mentally unstable gang of beheading medieval barbarians united with Stalinesque central planners — not just in New York and San Francisco, but in Dallas Texas and Mississippi and South Carolina and rural Georgia too? It’s truly dystopian.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

The Battle for the Future of MAGA Begins

Greg Gutfeld:

Emily: VP JD making the first move, blaming the Republicans’ losses on the Iran war, tweeting, “The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night, and the honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.”

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis laid out the damage.. ‘This is close to probably the last hundred years. This is going to last far beyond just two years. You look ahead to the ’28 election, the presidential election. You are not, as Republicans, going to be able to retake the Senate under this current map just two years from now. So this is really going to have an impact two years, four years, six years.’

So, Jesse, I keep trying—I want to figure this out. It could be both, but when he says Republicans’ reason for losing is the war, is it because the war went against Trump’s promise of no more wars? Which would make sense? Or was it just that it didn’t end as quickly as expected? Those are two very different things. And you can’t use one to supplant the other and say, “Oh, he said he’d never have a war,” when you are also okay with it if it was over quickly. You catch me?

Jesse Watters:

Yeah, it was over the price increase, because it drove up energy and it drove up rates.

So it wasn’t even about—

That’s what I believe. And I think that’s what people say when they talk about the war. It was about what it did to the prices. And the country wasn’t prepared for the war or persuaded that it was worth it. But the commander in chief, his mandate is to keep the country safe. And the country is safer because of that. But it smashed the base to smithereens. And JD might have to put it all back together. Young men, white working-class voters, male Hispanics. I mean, wow, that’s a lot of lifting.

But so he comes out with the statement, and, you know, he’s getting a lot of heat for it because a lot of people are like, “Well, why didn’t you say something about the war earlier?” Or maybe this is a little disloyal for you to do, JD. And then, you know, Trump was the one that did the MOU that Iran violated. But a lot of people in the administration gladly said it. They were thinking it, but glad he said it.

Now Trump can still stick the landing. Next six months, absolutely. And I think a lot of Republicans will be grateful that are running for president. And sometimes politics takes the back seat to war. Just got to finish the mission. And so we’ll see what he does.

Ron was on every show Tuesday and Wednesday. Every time I turn on the TV. And good for him. You know, he deserves it. Florida was at all. Everyone’s moving there. They have great politics. Going to run. The amount of waiting. See if a Democrat wins, challenges that Democrat—or some dark horse. Some guy just rides in, young gun, America First….

Greg: ..It’s not like Trump is trying to—not about politics. He weighed the consequences. Everybody can agree. He can agree. Vance can agree. It had consequences. So what then?

Emily Compagno:

Right, and I think JD Vance’s response is being treated as accurate but incomplete. In that, when he mentions the Iran war, it’s not the start of it. It’s that there hasn’t been an end to it. And it’s that during the development of it, people felt the effects at home when they thought their mandate was for an America First agenda. Young people especially. Especially. Mental effects now. Incredibly accurate. And he touched on a lot of stuff yesterday. They are on recess all the time. It just seemed like we inherited nothing but slop when it was quite clear what the mandate was and that there was power for two years to actually execute it.

But I think the signals that we’re seeing here is that DeSantis would b

e running on his government record because he’s making the distinction that Florida was sort of the bastion despite the blue tsunami. But Vance would be running on proximity to the administration. And that, to me, is the framework that 2028 would be all about.

What Americans need right now: We need everyone in Congress to actually put on their pants. We need people who represent the American people, who are tethered to the mandate, not tethered to the president. We need Congress to actually function on its own, not just totally attached to the president.

So what I see coming forward and incumbent on the landscape is every person needs to show what Americans are asking for and not be tied to what one person is doing or saying, because that one person will not be here anymore. But that Congress will be, and those candidates will be.

Greg to Harold Ford Jr:

So we’ve been talking to you about your side. Now time to talk about our side.

Harold:

I don’t think this is a side, but I understand what you’re saying. The president says we lost the Republicans because of the war. Now, a week ago, he was not saying that at all publicly. So it appears that because the numbers came back where Republicans got beaten pretty badly at the polling booth, that he now thinks the reason we lost is the war.

Does that mean we should not ensure that the Iranians don’t have a nuclear weapon and they can’t launch ballistic missiles and sprout proxies? I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt, and I’d love to hear him expand upon that.

And then to say that the president—he agreed on this in private. He often says he won’t disclose conversations, but maybe he will now.

I do think the American people, regardless of their side, want an end to this. No one wants to abruptly leave and give the Iranians a victory and give the Strait of Hormuz over to the Iranians so they can control that.

But I just didn’t like that comment. It was political and naive in so many ways to say what he said and say it how he said it.

Remember, throughout this time, the president has said we’re very close to a deal. He will oftentimes—he did it on Thursday or Friday so the market would jump back up for the weekend. “We’re close to a deal, and everybody should know we’re talking. They want me to give them a deal, but I want a better deal.”

He said that about Ukraine as well. He’ll have a little harder time saying that. And I hope the one positive about what the vice president has said is maybe there will be a willingness to work with Democrats and work with Republicans to try to get something done.

Finally, I don’t know who is going to win between JD Vance or Marco Rubio, but I’ll tell you, I like Marco Rubio personally. He’s a friend. But I think anybody who is serious about running, you’ve got to say a little more than the obvious. You have to tell us how you’re going to do it. That goes for Democrats, too.

Greg: Dana Perino?

Dana:

I would say no political movement lasts forever. And President Trump’s was longer because of the interruption of his two terms.

Worst halftime show ever.

Well, and very consequential, so. I believe that the party, and I think the country, is looking forward and needs to have a full-throated debate in the primary. So let’s see it.

And I don’t know how many people will run on the Republican side. I don’t think that JD will have that lane to himself, obviously, if the last 24 hours are any indication.

We haven’t mentioned Ted Cruz. He was out there immediately as well, and he’s been doing a podcast the last two years, like in the top 20, which is high in terms of how many people are listening. So he was never going to have that lane to himself.

And we’ll have that big debate. I just want to mention this morning on Newsroom, Jim Messina, who worked for Barack Obama, I put up a poll. Do we have that? About right? He said just too few. It was a double line. He said, “I have personally spoken to 29 candidates.”

But here’s the guess what? This is the best part. The first primary Democratic debate, do you know what date it is? April 1st.

I said, “Why didn’t they just make it April 2nd?”

Doesn’t make any sense.

The Five (on Fox)

Immediately, the naysayers would say prophecy has nothing to do with politics. Nothing could be further from the truth. Here are three very simple truths:

• We have never been closer to the Second Coming of Christ than we are today. By close, I mean a short amount of time.
• The American public has never been so far from eschatological (Second Coming) truth as it is at this moment.
• Politics and prophecy are connected at the hip. Whatever the politicians do is going to lead to what prophecy says is going to happen. It is not likelihood; it is impossible to separate them. We could not possibly escape some result from what we just created through our system of voting. How do I know this? “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Gal 6:7

The important word here is impossible.

Why is 2028 so important?

I watched with bated breath to see the result of this midterm election. To me, it meant something as a writer, as a prophet, as a preacher, more than it does to most people.

It is stunning to me that the result of this election is not only huge but whatever it produces will do so all the way to the year 2028. Of course, in 2028 there is another election, and presidential election years usually favor Republicans.

The most amazing thing to me about the year 2028 is that it coincides with everything I have ever known about the “Sabbath Millennial Theory.”

I am reasonably certain that most people involved with their own lives, daily affairs, and politics don’t care much about a Sabbath Millennial theory, and of course they know even less about it. I wouldn’t expect anyone to hurry to read this article about it. Just let me say, I urge you: do not miss it. The article starts out with this title.

Sabbath Millennial Theory? Is it Theory, Prophecies, or Patterns?

The article intro says: Articles like this will never make it into the mainstream media, but between unbelief and apostasy in our day, we would not hold such an expectation.

The answer to the question in the title is – all three. There is theory, a lot of scripture, and a well-structured pattern produced by the events of God’s dispensational will, as it is revealed in time and space.

Jesus Christ said no man would know the day or the hour of his return (Mk 13:32) but, then Christ gave us the parable of the fig tree (Mt 24:32) which seems to allow that many will be able to see the approach of the last days as it nears. It is not the naming of a year, day, or an hour, but can be rightly explained as a “season.”

To be sure it would not pay to name a year, much less a day for the return of Christ, but the season is well underway and the church, the theologians and certainly the eschatologists are more aware of this today than at any other time in history.

The world couldn’t care less about prophecy so I don’t expect a flood of readers. But among the Christians, the curious, the honorable, those that either love God or are drawn to consider Him will read this article.

What is a dispensation?

Those who refine prophecy, who study it very seriously, understand about dispensations. In plain English, God is a dispensationalist.

That is to say, he does a certain thing for a time, and he moves on to something else. Contrary to some people’s opinion, God is not boring. To name just a few dispensations: the period of law, the period of grace, the period of Christ’s entrance into the world, the period known as the millennial kingdom, and there are others.

The most common mistake that Christians make in their descriptions of dispensations is to include Christ’s birth, life, death, and resurrection in the Church Age. That period of time is what we call the Age of Grace, which extends from the resurrection of Christ to the present day.

It must not and cannot be included in the Church Age. What does that mean? That means that although there are some variables about when the birth of Christ was, we know that his entire life and ministry would have gone from about 4 BC onward and would have ended at 28 AD.

So, from the beginning of the Church Age to 2028 is exactly 2,000 years.

Now you can go and read the article, but if you choose not to read it, I’ll give you the quick breakdown right here.

God does things in sevens. We expect him to give us six days to do what we have to do, and the seventh day is his. Well, that works for all of history.

• There have been 2,000 years between Adam and Abraham.
• There have been 2,000 years between Abraham and Jesus Christ.
• Now, there are exactly 2,000 years between the beginning of the Church Age in the Book of Acts, when the Holy Spirit fell and the church began, and 2028. That is 2,000 years.

Now, since the Apostle Peter told us that to the Lord one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as one day, in 2028, six days will have passed.

The seventh day, we are clearly told, Christ has returned to Earth and rules this Earth before eternity begins for exactly 1,000 years. That’s why it’s called the period of the Sabbath Millennial, the time of rest for the Earth.

You don’t need algebra to figure this out. You only need history, and you’ve had all of it you could possibly use to see what this means.

Now for the bad news

Here is the bad news: we are not saying that Christ returns in 2028.

What we are saying is that the Antichrist will be revealed in or about that time, he will begin a seven-year rule.

By the way, that 7-year rule is called a dispensation.

He is going to tear this world up.

He will come on like gangbusters. He’ll look good. He’ll sound good, and everybody will pick him as if he were the savior of the world.

He keeps it a secret, but in fact, he is the devil incarnate. Our Bibles tell us that he is completely guided by the god of this world, who inhabits him, who possesses him, and endows him with all the available worldly knowledge in this present world to lead the world to the edge of its own total annihilation.

“And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.” Mt 24:22

Will America choose a blessing or a curse?

Anti-Semitism is making a comeback both in the United States and all over the world. While this was prophesied to happen, it comes with a price. That price falls under the same principle we previously mentioned that is found in Galatians 6:7, but even more than that, it comes with a fair warning. Here are three special verses which indicate how serious that warning is.

Gen 12:2-3

“And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:

And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”

Gen 27:29

“Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee: be lord over thy brethren, and let thy mother’s sons bow down to thee: cursed be every one that curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee.” Gen 27:29

Numbers 24:9

“…Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.”

Among those who won election yesterday in this country are several who are antisemites.

They are anti-Jewish, and they would end the relationship we have with Israel if they could.

I give fair warning: the day we end our relationship with Israel and cease to be their ally is the day a very dark cloud comes over America.

Three things we still have and will always have that are going for America

We should remember that while Talarico, who previously blasphemed Jesus Christ, may have won in Texas, he is not a king.

El Sayed, who won in Michigan, may think we deserved 9/11 and may support Hamas, but he is not a king.

All the socialists, communists, and Marxists that won in the recent elections are also not kings.

We can continue to fight tooth and nail, against everything they, the Democrats propose for this country, and we will.

We still have Donald Trump in office, and he has already spoken and promised to use the power of the veto to stop their nonsense in its tracks. We don’t need to boast of what he is going to do. We only need to remember he has always done what he said he would do.

Finally, we can continue to pray and ask God to deal with our leaders, to give them grace to promote what they’re proposing, or to stop them cold if need be. This is a power we’re called upon to exercise.

“I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;

For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.

For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;

Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

1 Timothy 2:1-4

Michael Bresciani

NewAmericanProphet.org

It didn’t take long for Democrats to drop the mask and reveal that they have no real intention of delivering on the “affordability” promises that filled their campaign ads. Their real agenda? Endless political witch hunts and pointless impeachments.

It’s no secret that Democrats are downright giddy at the prospect of retaking full control of Congress. But what they seem to be most excited about is using their subpoena and investigatory powers to harass and frustrate not just President Donald Trump, but the entire executive branch, Big Tech executives, Republican donors, and anyone else who gets in their way.

As it became clear that Democrats would win the House, Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), who now looks set to become chair of the House Oversight Committee, posted on X, “LAWYER UP.” Other Democrats echoed that message, with Oregon Senator Ron Wyden issuing a post that simply read “Subpoenas.”

Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey, meanwhile, declared that “they are going to need to plant new forests for all of the subpoenas we’ll be printing,” and Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) rattled off a list of Trump administration officials that should expect to be hauled before Congress. Democrats reportedly have even already put out job postings for investigators.

Far-left activist and podcaster Hasan Piker was even more explicit, posting on X, “WE’RE GONNA PUT YOUR A$$ IN JAIL EVERYONE GET MORE WOKE RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” His threat appeared to be directed at every conservative, rather than just members of the Trump administration. Piker is notably close with incoming Michigan Democrat Senator Abdul El-Sayed, along with several other socialist candidates who won this week. It is likely that Piker will continue to have their ear in Congress and could hold sway over how the new Democrat majorities wield their investigatory powers.

Americans can expect talk of a third Trump impeachment to begin almost immediately, and especially after Democrats officially retake power in January. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is also a top target, along with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin. Of course, while impeachment in the House requires only a simple majority vote, conviction and removal from office in the Senate requires 67 senators, a number Democrats are still well short of.

So, in short, any impeachments will yet again be nothing more than political theater. The first two Trump impeachments cost an estimated $13.4 million, and that’s not to mention the hidden costs of wasting time that could be spent legislating on performative political witch hunts. The party that promised “affordability” is going to spend most of the next two years abusing its power to exact revenge on their enemies – and it won’t do a thing to lower costs for anyone.

None of this should come as a surprise to Americans who could read between the lines leading up to Election Day. As AMAC Newsline reported all the way back in September, Democrats have not done a very good job of hiding that their number one priority is vengeance. Even before the midterms, Texas Democrat Rep. Al Green forced yet another impeachment vote against Trump (it failed). Shortly after that vote, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries – soon to be Speaker of the House Hakeem Jeffries – stated that he “hadn’t ruled anything out in terms of impeachment.” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has also called impeachment “a critical tool in the toolbox” for Democrats.

Moreover, not a single Democrat who won on Tuesday made a compelling case that their party has a plan to lower costs.

We are just a few years removed from the last Democrat trifecta – when inflation soared above nine percent and fuel costs were, adjusting for inflation, far higher than they are today. There is no indication that Democrats have changed their agenda at all. If anything, it has only become more radical. One of Democrats’ greatest legislative ambitions is “Medicare for All,” which would cost literally trillions of dollars, in addition to turning the American healthcare system into a Canadian-style disaster.

So don’t expect much price relief from a Democrat Congress. To the extent that prices do come down, it will be thanks to executive action from the Trump administration. Democrats simply do not have a platform that is at all conducive to economic prosperity.

The good news for Democrats is that their “affordability” hoax seems to have worked. But whether they can maintain the charade long enough to secure lasting power remains an open question.

Shane Harris, AMAC Newsline

EL PASO, TX — After the political winds ushered in sweeping changes to the Lone Star State last night, with radical Democrats taking power in what had been a staunchly conservative stronghold, millions of Texans were seen crossing the Rio Grande into Mexico.

As Democrats prepared to give Texas a drastic makeover, longtime conservative residents of the state packed up their most treasured possessions and prepared to flee in search of a better life somewhere south of the border.

“We’re setting off to find a place where we can live in freedom,” said conservative Texan Derek Johnson. “I’ve got a wife and kids, so I’m wanting to give them a better life somewhere where they won’t have to live under oppressive third-world tyranny. I think life in Mexico under the cartels sounds a lot better than living in a blue Texas. The food is really good, too.”

While Texas had long been viewed as the standard-bearer for conservative Republican states in the U.S., the “blue wave” looked to displace millions of patriotic Americans who feared for their futures under Democratic rule. “It’s not going to be safe to live here,” said Fort Worth resident Chris Wilson. “It’s time to go in search of liberty and a brighter future filled with more opportunity. Maybe Venezuela. It’ll be better there than here in a few years, that’s for sure.”

At publishing time, the incoming Democratic regime in Texas had reportedly planned to install a border fence to prevent fleeing Republicans from leaving the state.

Babylon Bee

Democrats and leftists HATE. They hate Trump. They hated Reagan, too. They hate capitalism. They hate wealth and private property (except their own). They hate choice over one’s own body (except for abortion and weed). They hate guns in the hands of good guys. They hate objective truth. They loathe reality. They hate white people. They hate Christians. They hate heterosexual men, especially if they possess any self-assertion. They hate Jews. They loathe independence and autonomy. They hate voter ID laws. They hate borders — especially for violent felons. They despise Americans. They hate police. They hate the military. They hate free speech. They hate America’s founders. They hate the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, especially when applied to anyone other than themselves. They hate mathematics and real science, or anything that smacks of certainty without serving their deranged and illusory Narratives. They hate human achievements. They hate progress and want to reverse the Industrial Revolution. They hate fossil fuels and — give them time — they will come to hate electricity too. They hate the momentum of technology and the beauty of innovation that serves human progress; they much prefer savages, because savages destroy the life forces they so hate.

I cannot think of a single thing that leftists love. Can you?

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

If you think about it, nothing has changed since the election Tuesday. Half of the country is enraged with the other half, hoping to retaliate against the other side in 2 years. This time, however, the victorious seem very certain they will not have to worry about losing power. Democrats are very confident in government, at least when socialists and Muslims are in charge. This speaks to their gullibility to socialism in the first place. “Put progressives in charge of all human enterprise, and everything will be great, forever.” They are not concerned about using government force to obliterate dissension or incorrect thinking. Socially leftist “progressives” and Muslims share this totalitarian attitude, which explains their bizarre yet ultimately impossible coalition.

The reality? We’re right back where we were two years ago. And two years before that. And two years before that. One side hates the other, and WILL NOT back down. I do not know how the story ends. I can only say with certainty: this is NOT sustainable.

*******

J.D. Vance says Republicans lost because of the Iran war. Does this mean he doesn’t think it’s necessary to stop Iran from having nuclear weapons? Does he think they would never use nuclear weapons as blackmail? Or does he not believe that Iran was close to a nuclear weapon?
The military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq were a pitiful and tragic waste. Iran may be the only legitimate reason to act militarily. Trump’s problem was that he didn’t finish them off.

Republicans lost because the brainwashed masses think socialism will preserve prosperity while reducing costs. Won’t they be surprised.

I do not trust Vance. I am open to Rubio. And DeSantis. America will be paralyzed and more toxic than ever by 2028. The economy will probably worsen. Something like COVID will also be orchestrated to prevent a Republican presidency. I cannot predict what it will specifically be (nobody can), but it will be bad. I don’t think it will be another exaggerated flu. It will involve shutting down things as a way to control people and enable more election fraud, fear and compliance. Given the state of our electorate based on yesterday, it shouldn’t be too difficult. Democrats in Congress will paralyze Trump, prevent him from doing anything good, and then blame him for worse inflation, debt and the like. Congress will also take extraordinary measures against Trump’s aides, Cabinet and their families. This will be really ugly and cruel. Democrats (now radicalized) are a horrific hybrid of mobsters, fascists and sociopaths like you find on true crime shows. You will see a lot of evidence for this. The torpid voters will probably go along with it, holding out for that elusive “affordability.” The government will make us all poorer and then make us more dependent on them when prices go up. It’s so obvious

*******

Ironic. The Democratic Socialist Party platform (now merged with the Democratic Party) calls for abolishing the U.S. Senate. They will use that same Senate to vote away our individual rights and destroy America. Nice job, voters. Hope you enjoy your slightly lower cost of gas (which will not happen).

Will Democrats be as unpopular in 2028 as Republicans are now? I wish I could be so sure. The precursors to the radicals elected Tuesday are Bernie Sanders, AOC, Ilhan Omar and a few others. Again and again, they have all won reelection. I am unaware of any state that has flipped Democratic to Republican; but even before Tuesday, there were examples of states that had moved from red to purple or blue. Now we have even more: South Carolina, Georgia, Texas, and even Mississippi. North Carolina and Virginia were already succumbing to socialism.

For the last 20 years or more, the trend has been: Democratic states, once Democratic, stay Democratic. Forever. Many Republican states turn, but Democratic ones don’t. Tuesday’s horrifying election results merely escalated that trend. Florida remains the one exception; however, Florida was a purple state, never really a blue one, before going red. As it looks now, Florida may be the only red state left before long.

The problem is deeper than politics. It’s propaganda of one side posing as objective media and education. And almost nobody has critical thinking skills any longer. The present 20 and 30 somethings have been so brainwashed they cannot even grasp an alternative to what they voted for on Tuesday. I would love to be wrong. I wish to be wrong more than anything; truly I do. But the evidence is growing, and on Election Day, it was staggering.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) issued a stark warning on Wednesday evening after Democrats flipped a Texas Senate seat and the governor’s mansion in the midterm elections.

In a lengthy statement shared on social media, the GOP senator said that “Texans will be hurt” by the blue tsunami that swept across the state and country on Tuesday.

“Their assault on business will make Texas a much less attractive place to start or grow a small business,” he wrote. “Texas will become more like California if they succeed in halting all new investment into AI.”

State Reps. James Talarico and Gina Hinojosa became the first Democrats elected to the U.S. Senate and Texas governor’s office in decades in a stunning upset for Republicans in the Lone Star State on Election Day.

“Texas is blue. That is a hard sentence to utter,” Cruz wrote. “But Texas, today at least, is blue. As we sit here today, I am the only statewide elected Republican who remains in Texas. That’s not something I ever thought I would say.”

The Texas Republican and other prominent GOP leaders, including President Trump, backed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) in the Senate race. Talarico defeated the Republican nominee by over 12 percentage points, according to Decision Desk HQ.

Cruz said he spoke with the Democratic victor following his win on Tuesday evening to congratulate him “on his very impressive victory.”

“It was a pleasant conversation, and I told him that I looked forward to working with him to try to benefit Texas,” he said.

The Republican senator said his party will need to do “two things” in the next two years under new Democratic control of both chambers of Congress: “fight the madness” and “rebuild.”

Sarah Davis, The Hill