“He needs to go”: Dems rage over Fetterman’s DHS vote

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) is under heavy fire from fellow Democrats for casting the deciding vote to advance Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s (R-Okla.) nomination for DHS secretary, with some openly calling for his ouster.Why it matters: The idea of trying to unseat Fetterman is never far from many Democrats’ minds, but rarely has it been discussed so explicitly and so openly.

“Once again Sen Fetterman shows why he is Trump’s favorite Democrat. He needs to go,” Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), one of Fetterman’s harshest critics, said in a post on X.Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee and a rumored potential primary rival to Fetterman, has publicly criticized the senator before, but this was the first time he has expressed support for his removal.Fetterman’s office did not respond to a request for comment on this story.What happened: Fetterman voted with Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to advance Mullin’s nomination to a floor vote.The vote was 8-7, with all Democrats and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), the chair of the committee, voting against Mullin’s nomination — making Fetterman the deciding vote.The Pennsylvania Democrat, first elected in 2022 as a progressive, has since stunned erstwhile allies by tacking to the right, staunchly defending Israel and extending frequent olive branches to the GOP.

What they’re saying: “If you needed any more proof that Fetterman has completely abandoned his constituents, here it is. Pennsylvanians deserve a Senator that actually fights for them,” Rep. Pat Ryan (D-N.Y.) said on X.Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.), who had urged constituents ahead of the vote to call Fetterman’s office and ask him to oppose Mullin’s nomination, compared him negatively to Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) at a town hall Thursday night.”Well, we have this senator — we have two actually,” she said to boos from the crowd. “And I have to be really honest with you, of the two I have more success in working with the one on the [Republican] side of the aisle than the one on the [Democratic] side of the aisle.”Zoom out: It wasn’t just sitting members of Congress tearing into the Pennsylvania senator. 

Rep. Conor Lamb, who was Fetterman’s top Democratic primary opponent in 2022 and has remained critical of him, posted on X: “Did people think this vigilante was voting to protect their rights? Come on.”Moe Davis, an unsuccessful 2020 North Carolina congressional candidate, even apologized to former donors for sharing his donor list with the Fetterman campaign.”I sincerely regret whatever part I had in helping to elect [John Fetterman] in 2022.”The other side: “In January, I called on the president to fire [former DHS Secretary Kristi] Noem — and he did,” Fetterman said in a statement defending his vote.”I truly approached the confirmation of my colleague and friend, Senator Mullin, with an open-mind. We need a leader at DHS. We must reopen DHS.”Fetterman said his vote was “rooted in a strong committed, constructive working relationship with Senator Mullin for our nation’s 

Andrew Solender

Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders Kicked out of Arkansas Restaurant

Sarah Huckabee Sanders @SarahHuckabee Last week I was having lunch with two other moms at a restaurant when the owner approached a member of the State Police Executive Protection Detail and said my presence made their employees feel threatened and told us to leave.

Arkansans are known for their warm hospitality, and while that restaurant didn’t meet that standard, my administration will continue to focus on lifting Arkansans up, not tearing others down.

Students walk out on Lecture Given by Hillary Clinton

Approximately 30 students at Columbia University walked out of a lecture led by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday.

The protest, related to the Israel-Hamas conflict, was prompted by concerns over the university’s handling of a truck, which prominently featured photographs of students who had signed a letter holding Israel responsible for the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, The Hill reported.

These images were displayed alongside the words “Columbia’s Leading Antisemites,” according to the New York Times.

The student protesters claimed the photographs had been sourced from a supposedly secure and private online platform for students at the School of International and Public Affairs.

According to the statement released by the protesting students, “The weight of responsibility for the war and casualties undeniably lies with the Israeli extremist government.”

The protest, described as peaceful and planned, included a dialogue between the students and the international and public affairs school dean, Keren Yarhi-Milo, who co-taught the class with Clinton.

In a message to students on Tuesday, Yarhi-Milo expressed her deep concern over doxxing campaigns against SIPA (School of International and Public Affairs) students and faculty. She unequivocally condemned these actions and announced the formation of a SIPA Task Force on Doxing and Student Safety to address these issues on campus and online.

“I unequivocally condemn such actions, and I’m doing everything in my power to bring these activities to an end on our campus and online,” she said.

This demonstration at Columbia University is part of a broader wave of turmoil surrounding the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict on college campuses across the United States.

Recently, students at George Washington University garnered national attention for projecting anti-Israel messages on a campus library.

Senator Mike Lee, R-Utah, expressed his concern regarding these messages on X, stating, “These are genocidal messages displayed on a building at George Washington University. If the students responsible for these messages aren’t severely punished by GWU, something is terribly wrong. Genocide isn’t hip, cute, or in any way acceptable. GWU—do the right thing NOW!”

Clinton, known for her support of the state of Israel, has been vocal in rejecting calls for a cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas conflict.

During a recent speech at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy’s 30th-anniversary event, she contended that a cease-fire would be a “gift” to the terrorist government of Hamas. She remarked, “People who are calling for a cease-fire now don’t understand Hamas. That is not possible,” reported Fox News.

Jim Thomas    Jim Thomas is a writer based in Indiana. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science, a law degree from U.I.C. Law School, and has practiced law for more than 20 years.

Not Just MAGA: Politico Poll Shows Americans Support Iran War

During the past three weeks, the Protection Racket Media has had a field day speculating that the war with Iran would split the MAGA base and infuriate those who demand America First policies. Poll after poll has contradicted that speculation. It turns out that the better question might be whether the war is splitting Donald Trump’s opposition.

Politico published a new poll this morning, taken this week, even while Iran forced a strangulation of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The poll shows sharp support for the war among Republicans, and even more robust support among self-identified MAGA voters, as previous surveys from NBC News and CNN have demonstrated. However, it also shows something else about overall support, as shown in the graphic tweeted out by Politico’s Erin Doherty:

The percentage of respondents supporting the war in the MAGA and non-MAGA cohorts reflects the results of similar polling this week, even if the numbers differ slightly. Doherty’s report focuses on that aspect:

President Donald Trump’s war in Iran is testing the bounds of his “America First” agenda. So far, his supporters are sticking with him.

New results from The POLITICO Poll show that Trump’s 2024 voters are willing to accept the offensive, even as some of them say it violates MAGA principles or breaks his campaign promise not to start new wars. Their support is driven in large part by their unwavering trust in the president and his assurances the U.S. will only be involved “short term.”

But there are signs Trump’s hold could grow tenuous as he intensifies military action. Trump voters are more split on backing the war if it results in more lives lost. The president has called the strikes a success, but America’s increasing military build-up in the Middle East has spurred fears that the intervention will involve ground troops and result in a much longer conflict than expected.

The “signs” come from another question about whether the mission is worth the loss of more American lives. That’s a pretty loaded question, as it acts essentially to push the responder into an emotional choice. Even so, MAGA voters still support the mission by a wide margin, 58/32, while non-MAGA Republicans split nearly evenly at 44/41. Among all voters, support flips to opposition, but perhaps surprisingly by a bare majority, 32/50.

However, this highlights the real news from this poll. In the topline question, overall voters support the war with Iran, 43/33. It’s a plurality, to be sure, but it’s still a statistically significant split in favor of the war. The low level of outright opposition to the war should prompt questions about whether the war is in fact splitting Democrats – a question Doherty never even addresses. In fact, her analysis never even mentions Democrats or independent voters, let alone the ten-point plurality supporting the war.

What kind of split are Democrats and independents experiencing? Politico has its crosstabs in a link to an Excel document for downloading, so the data isn’t formatted for easy publication. However, the spreadsheet shows that ten percent of Democrat midterm voters strongly support the war, and another 14% choose “support,” combining for 24% of the party against 56% who oppose it. That is a far larger split than among GOP midterm voters overall, who support the war 74/10. Undecided midterm voters narrowly support the war 28/22, with the other half either undecided or unwilling to say. 

Here are some other interesting demo splits on the topline question of support/opposition:

  • Males: 53/30
  • Females: 36/35
  • 18-24YOs: 40/28
  • 25-34YOs: 47/28
  • College graduates: 46/38
  • Black voters: 34/36
  • Hispanics: 40/32
  • Asian: 39/39
  • Income <$25K: 38/27
  • Income $25-49K: 39/40
  • Income $50-99K: 46/36
  • Income >$100K: 55/29

These numbers paint a very cautionary picture for Democrats attempting a knee-jerk, defeatist opposition to the war effort. Their own strongest demographics show significant support for the war on Iran, probably because Democrat Party leaders have made Iran’s threat clear over the past few decades, as have Republican Party leaders. They may see this as it truly is – a long-overdue action to put an end to a clear and present danger to the US, our interests, and our allies, in that order. 

The real question here isn’t a MAGA split, but whether Democrats may fracture on the war in the midterms … especially if the US and Trump succeeds in ending the threat from Iran. It’s very curious why the media has not asked that question, even when they have the data in their hands.

An Inside Look at the World of Preppers Preparing for Society’s Collapse

When I set out to explore the world of prepping, I was unsure of what to expect – part of me imagined something theatrical, such as zombie apocalypse kits or nuclear bunkers.

But as I ventured into the mid Wales countryside, it became clear I had fallen victim to the stereotypes.

Leigh Price, 51, from Builth Wells, said he was not prepping for hordes of the undead roaming the landscape, as many might assume, but for much more real threats.

“Everyone thinks a prepper is some sort of tin-hat wearing nut job, don’t get me wrong, there’s a few of them about. But you get a lot of the prep stereotypes from America, in the UK it’s totally different.”

Prepping is a global movement of people getting ready for the eventuality that society will – in part or fully – collapse.

It often involves having a supply of food and learning skills required to fend for yourself.

Leigh, a dad of three, served in the Army but now runs a dedicated preppers shop and is a survival course provider.

Surrounded by trees in rural Powys, it is a tranquil environment for a shop that had all the gear you could imagine to survive the end of civilisation – including cross bows and walls of knives.

Leigh said: “Some people are preparing for the end of the world, a nuclear attack or whatever it is and I always say ‘look when it comes to nuclear attack, it’s not impossible, but it’s highly unlikely’.

“You’re better off preparing against the things that you are more likely to come across.”

Leigh said: “The world is getting a bit more dangerous. Civil unrest is at boiling point there’s a few things going on the world and nation against nation.”

His list of potential threats include cyber attacks which “could take down the national grid”, disrupting all aspects of modern life.

“If it takes down the electric grids, we’re back to the stone age. At least for a couple days.

“You can imagine then when people are panicking, people tend to do desperate things.

“The worst case that will happen is people start looting people’s houses, there’ll be fights, fires… so how would you prepare against that?”

I had assumed I could simply grab my first aid kit and tent and run to the hills in such a scenario, only for Leigh to tell me this was the biggest mistake people make.

“They think they could survive like John Rambo in the wild, but after a couple of days of wind and rain and cold, they’re gonna think twice about it,” he said.

The key is to defend your location or to move to a safer one, like a friend’s house, he said.

Leigh said many people believe preppers have bunkers full of guns and ammo, but really it is “everyday run-of-the-mill people from all walks of life, from all political spectrums” who have enough basics to survive weeks without needing supermarkets or the government.

To assess where I stood in terms of being prepared, Price gave me a test. After asking several questions about my supply of food, water and first aid kits, he told me I scored 7/10.

It turns out being used to doing a big shop from growing up in rural Cornwall and having camping equipment makes you fairly prepared.

But to get that score up, I would need to buy a better first aid kit, a water filter and more food – much more food.

As for Leigh, he said he had always been prepared for emergencies, but considers that just being sensible.

He partially began the shop after the Covid pandemic so he could prepare if anything similar happened again after having to close his previous business.

“I thought ‘well, I’m going to do something elsewhere, even if that happened again’, [so] I could still run a business and feed my family.”

Running the shop means he can buy his own prepping gear at wholesale prices. He said it couldn’t “even hazard a guess” at how much he has spent prepping, but thinks it might be “a couple thousands of pounds”.

He added that he is not obsessed by prepping and only spends about an hour a week checking his gear is up to scratch.

Leigh’s stores come in useful in all kinds of emergencies, he said, and living in a rural area he gets his water from a borehole, meaning any potential blackout does not just turn off the lights, it means no drinking water unless you can purify it.

Which of course, he can because he has a water filter pump to access this groundwater reserve through the borehole.

you’ve got stuff at home squared away, no matter what comes your way, you can deal with it.”

This means a different approach depending on where you are.

For example, on a trip to London he said: “I’d always have a first aid kit, no matter where I’m going. I’d probably have some sort of scarf, if there’s perhaps a fire you can cover your mouth with it. A torch, notebook and pen, a good raincoat.”

Leigh said one of the things he recommended was finding a community: “We’ve thrived as a human species by living together, no-one is going to survive on their own from running off to the wilderness.

“In a dire situation, we are better off working together.”

Three years ago there was only one preppers meet-up in Wales, but now they happen regularly all over the country, said Leigh.

Donna Lloyd, 60, also believes in creating a community.

She runs a Facebook page on prepping and began gathering supplies after her electricity went down during lockdown.

She and her wife, who live in Powys, were unable to make a cup of tea so a friend came to their house with a camping stove to boil water.

“It was like that lightbulb moment, I felt sort of vulnerable and a bit stupid,” she said.

“I thought ‘well, I can buy a camping stove. I can do that’.”

Donna, who used to work in the military but now works in education, stores water, tinned food, freeze-dried food, tea, coffee, powdered milk and a first aid kit.

Like Leigh, Donna is not preparing for anything in particular, she is just aware that something could happen.

thinks there is a stereotype of what a prepper looks like, but in reality there is a spectrum.

From those who have their own fallout shelters to those who just carry torches in their bags, she said: “I fall somewhere in the middle.”

The world of prepping can be a very secretive place, she said, ranging from “discreetly storing supplies to full ‘lone wolf’ isolation, much of the time to avoid stigma and labelling” with other focus on community building.

But Donna said this mindset did not stop her from living life normally, and she still goes on holiday.

“Help you as a person to have confidence, help you as a person feel more in control, more able to deal with situations and be more aware of your environment.”

“There are ways to be prepared, so should you be away from what you normally carry around, you can still utilise or improvise what you do have.

“Something I carry with me all the time is a little credit card survival tool with different attachments like a screwdriver and bottle opener.”

She said another way to feel more confident would be to learn how to build a fire.

“It’s not necessarily about making a fire, it’s the skill of being able to identify the things that help you build a fire.

She said she doesn’t do this for fun – prepping helps her feel more confident and safe.

his is a sentiment echoed by Leigh: “Having those initial supplies you’re going to feel a little bit better than someone else who’s got nothing at all.

“A good saying in preparedness is it’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.”

Rowenna Hoskin BBC Wales

The Shadow War Against President Trump

Contact JWR
More Articles

Article Tools

23Shares

print-white sharing button
email-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
facebook-white sharing button
whatsapp-white sharing button

 Contact The Editor Articles By This AuthorSIGN UP FOR THE DAILY JWR UPDATE. IT’S FREE. (AND NO SPAM!) Just click here.

The joint American-Israeli military operation against the Iranian regime is now three weeks old, but there is another war — a more silent one — raging here on the home front. President Donald Trump’s second administration is facing a highly coordinated shadow war — one waged both by some influential outside voices on the Right and, more dangerously, by their subversive allies within Trump’s very own government.

If this campaign is not confronted and decisively defeated, the result will be calamitous: a second Trump term that drifts into lame-duck status not due to a voter backlash but because of an insurrection from within. What this column has previously referred to as “Operation Divide MAGA” has reached fever pitch. And Trump, to his great credit, has begun to settle all the MAGA family business. But an even more concerted effort is needed to clean out the Augean Stables once and for all.

First, let’s take a step back.

In any healthy political coalition or movement, debate is inevitable and often desirable. But what we have seen from certain high-profile podcasters, such as Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, is nothing less than a full-scale assault on Trump and his agenda. These provocateurs first outed themselves last summer, when they all but accused Trump of covering up a global (Mossad-tied?) pedophile ring over his Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files. But above all, the podcasters’ subversion has focused on foreign policy — most recently, on Iran and Operation Epic Fury.

Trump is a conservative nationalist. His foreign policy is rooted in confidence and “peace through strength”-style deterrence. Yet Carlson, Kelly and their fellow travelers have blasted the Iran conflict as everything from “evil” (Carlson) to “clearly Israel’s war” (Kelly). The not-so-dynamic duo is thus accusing the man they quite literally campaigned for in 2024 of engaging in heinous acts and of being the unwitting dupe of a foreign government.

True, Carlson and Kelly do not actually speak for the MAGA base: A brand-new poll from J.L. Partners shows that 83% of Republican voters support Epic Fury. Moreover, Republicans agree with Trump over Carlson and Kelly on foreign policy by a whopping 84%-6% margin. But still: Their platforms are enormous. When Carlson, Kelly and their allies consistently excoriate the leading priorities of the administration they purport to support, the effect is Republican voter confusion, resentment and depression as we head toward November in a midterm election year.

Even worse, the shadow war subversives are not merely shouting into their microphones from the rafters. They have allies inside the administration, with whom they are all but assuredly coordinating, engaging in outright sabotage against the one man — the president of the United States — who was actually elected to wield the “executive Power” of the federal government and serve as commander in chief.

The most alarming developments are emerging from within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. A former Democratic congresswoman with a pro-Moscow slant once seen as a heterodox ally, Gabbard now oversees an environment that increasingly bears the markings of an anti-MAGA coup.

Take Gabbard’s recent rehiring of Dan Caldwell. Dismissed last year by his (former longtime friend) Secretary of War Pete Hegseth amid allegations of leaking, Caldwell is now back in a highly sensitive role. Leaks of this nature are not bureaucratic slip-ups; they are direct assaults on national security and the integrity of the constitutional chain of command. It is difficult to interpret the isolationist-leaning Gabbard’s move as anything other than a direct shot across the bow at Hegseth — and, by extension, the boss Hegseth has so passionately defended since Epic Fury began, Trump.

Consider also Joe Kent, who until recently served under Gabbard as director of the National Counterterrorism Center. Kent resigned this week in flamboyant fashion, rationalizing his stunt with hyper-conspiratorial, antisemitic rhetoric better suited for a Code Pink rally than government letterhead. Within hours after tendering his resignation, Kent announced he would be joining — who else? — Carlson to tell his story. An alleged serial leaker, Kent is now under FBI investigation for spilling national security secrets. Unsurprisingly, Iranian regime propaganda television gobbled up the interview and regurgitated it for an impressionable English-speaking audience.

That Kent came to Carlson’s platform to try to get ahead of the FBI investigation revelation is not coincidence. It is all orchestrated. After being fired by Hegseth last year, Caldwell similarly ran to Carlson to tell his side of the story. Moreover, one of Caldwell’s higher-ranking colleagues at ODNI, Will Ruger, shares Caldwell’s professional background in the isolationist Koch network. Surprise!

The White House Presidential Personnel Office, formerly directed by ex-Rand Paul staffer Sergio Gor (since shipped halfway around the world to India), has allowed in individuals across the defense, intelligence and national security spaces that are functionally anti-MAGA. Perhaps this was done for self-serving reasons. Perhaps Gor and PPO were under the understanding that MAGA is something other than what the boss says it is. Frankly, it does not really matter.

Because the boss has now spoken. He’s cast Carlson and Kelly out of MAGA in emphatic fashion. And after Kent’s obnoxious resignation stunt, Trump said of those (like Kent) who do not believe Iran is a threat to the United States: “We don’t want those people.” Translation: Get out. The message could not possibly be clearer.

But is Trump’s PPO listening? Is Gabbard’s ODNI fully in line? Gabbard, in Senate testimony this week, couldn’t bring herself to agree with her boss’s assessment that Iran posed an “imminent threat” prior to the launch of Epic Fury.

It’s time for the president to team up with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and other arch-loyalists, such as Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, and clean house. The internal anti-MAGA sabotage must be ended, and the external anti-MAGA sabotage must be combated. The success of the remainder of Trump’s second term hangs in the balance.

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Josh Hammer is senior editor-at-large at Newsweek, a research fellow with the Edmund Burke Foundation, counsel and policy advisor for the Internet Accountability Project, a syndicated columnist through Creators and a contributing editor for Anchoring Truths

The Magical Yellow Brick Road of Today’s Psychiatric Industry

Here’s what has happened in our world today. It’s deeper than politics; and nobody escapes it, because the faulty thinking is so unchallenged and prevalent, it’s almost in our DNA. Instead of holding people (especially loved ones) accountable for their actions, we question ourselves. “I shouldn’t be mean. I shouldn’t be a redneck. I shouldn’t be unsophisticated.” So what do we do? “My loved one isn’t being wrong. Who am I to judge right or wrong? It’s a mental problem.” Drug abuse, bad spending decisions, laziness, impulsivity, shyness, illogical behavior, poor judgment, honest ignorance, overly negative thinking — instead of errors, we call all these things “diseases,” and treat them as if they’re diseases. But they’re not diseases.

Then we take the loved one to the mental health professional, for “help” — but it’s usually a charade. “Help” doesn’t mean helping the person to become a better person; it means making the person change without his knowledge or consent. “If the therapist/psychiatrist can change my loved one’s actions and even attitudes, then I won’t have to face the consequences of calling him or her on what he or she is doing wrong.” No therapist is going to change anyone. We can only change ourselves. A therapist can possibly help you change yourself — but nobody is going to get into your body and mind, become YOU, and make your choices for you! Nobody.

It’s all a way to escape the responsibility of judgment. Of getting to feel like you’re a nice, sensitive and upstanding progressive Citizen of Society. But the fact remains: Wrong is wrong. Your loved one is doing something stupid or wrong, and possibly asking you to take the brunt of the consequences for it. Instead of saying, “No, I am no longer willing to assist you in doing stupid things,” you reach out to the psychiatric industry to do it for you. But it’s magical thinking. You might as well be skipping your way along the Yellow Brick Road to meet the Wizard of Oz, whom you fantasize will change your loved one with no consequences to yourself. Dream on, citizens. Human nature and reality don’t work that way.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Iran’s Most Powerful Weapon

Three weeks into a military engagement in Iran, a war Republicans will not call a war, the American and Israeli militaries have all but wiped out Iran’s capacity to make war. We have killed their leadership, the replacement leaders, and militia members on the ground. We have destroyed their missile launchers and the factories in which they made the missiles. But Iran still has one of the most powerful weapons in the world on its side, and it is ruthlessly deploying it – the American press corps.

“Families mourn as dead are laid to rest in Tehran,” blared the front page, above the fold headline in the Athens Banner-Herald in Athens, Georgia. Beneath the headline, a grieving mother dressed fully in black held a black-framed portrait of her dead son with a black band across the portrait. Her son was in a military uniform.

The Detroit News ran another picture of the same mother with the same story. “Marzia Rezaei reacts while standing near the grave of her son, Erfan, who was killed in strikes, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, at Behesht-e Zahra cemetery, in Tehran, Iran, March 16, 2026.” Reuters, the wire service, got credit for both pictures and the underlying story.

The Detroit News, the Athens Banner-Herald, and other news outlets featuring the dead Iranian soldier ran no front-page stories with the names and faces of the 35,000 Iranian citizens that Erfan Shamei, the dead soldier in the picture, would have been complicit in killing. When Iranian protesters took to the streets in January, the Iranian regime opened fire on them. Outside observers claim up to 150,000 would have been wounded and many killed. Iran itself claims 35,000 were killed.

In Tehran, the regime punished two nurses who had aided the wounded by letting men gang rape them. They were so severely raped that their uteruses had to be removed. The Athens Banner-Herald did not cover that. But a dead regime soldier killed by American and Israeli air strikes warranted front-page news coverage in newspapers across America.

The American press claims it is “just asking questions,” which is the same line used by the antisemitic conspiracy theorists online also rooting against the United States and Israel. The press should hold officials accountable, but they are desperate for the American military to fail because they really do not want President Donald Trump to succeed.

For over a decade, the American press has built up a repository of conventional wisdom that Trump keeps defying. Moving the American Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem would destabilize the region and lead to war. It did not. Killing Qasem Soleimani would lead to war. It did not. Now, the press is left to assure us that the American and Israeli military are killing all the moderate Iranian leaders and only the hardliners will be left, which will lead to a forever war.

Only in the newsrooms of America could a leadership that killed 35,000 of its citizens, hang gay men by cranes, and gang rapes nurses rendering aid be considered moderate. Now, relying on conventional wisdom, the press tells us we cannot win or even that we are losing. The press relies on voices that process most of their insights through their hatred of Donald Trump and other voices that have long had ties to the Iranian regime.

We captured and jailed Nicolas Maduro and have Cuba on the verge of collapse, with Cubans starting to riot and burn down communist party offices around the country. We have deprived China of oil from Iran. We have deprived Russia of Iranian drones to use in Ukraine. But the American press would rather us believe we are on the verge of defeat at the hands of the fifth deputy under lieutenant of toilet bowls of Iran, the last leader standing and now defiantly a hardliner.

“An ABC News analysis of satellite imagery and verified videos suggests that at least 10 radar sites used by the U.S. and its allies have been struck by Iranian drones or missiles since the start of the war,” tweeted that network. Do not wait for ABC News to do the same about Iran. They are rooting for Iran.


Erik Erikson, Townhall

Democratic Socialists Stand up for Cuba


Word is that things are a little rough down in Cuba right now. In my post of February 23, I reported that Cuba had become the first nation in the world to achieve the climate activists’ Holy Grail of “Net Zero” carbon emissions. I had looked around for news of the big celebration of Cuba’s achievement, but I couldn’t find any mention of it. If I had understood things correctly — and I think I had — Net Zero was supposed to deliver abundant and much cheaper electricity from the free wind and sun, lowering everybody’s energy costs, creating jobs, and saving the planet in the process. And yet, in a February 20 piece, the New York Times had revealed that the process of achieving Net Zero had somehow brought Cuba “to its knees.” Are we missing something here?

And then two days ago, March 16, the BBC (and many other sources) reported that the entire island of Cuba had been plunged into a blackout. Apparently there has since been some partial restoration of power, but much or even most of the island remains in darkness, without much prospect of relief any time soon.

Of all groups that ought to be celebrating, at the top of the list would be the Democratic Socialists of America. They have been among the most forceful advocates for the rapid if not immediate elimination of fossil fuels from the energy system. Prominent members of the DSA include the Bronx/Queens it-girl Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and New York’s new Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, although apparently not formally a member of DSA, has both supported and been supported by the group.

So I went to the DSA website to find information about their celebration of Cuba’s achievement. It’s not there. Instead, I find this:

The Trump administration has escalated the decades-long embargo on Cuba, cutting off the island’s access to oil, choking its energy grid, and accelerating a humanitarian crisis. . . .

OK, that’s one take, but frankly it’s rather lame. Yes, the U.S. has boycotted Cuba for decades, not just under Trump, but during both Republican and Democratic presidencies. But the U.S. is just one country out of nearly 200 in the world, constituting around 25% of the world economy. That leaves the other 190+ countries and 75% of the world economy that is not boycotting Cuba. Europe is not boycotting Cuba. China is not boycotting Cuba. Brazil and Mexico are not boycotting Cuba. Canada is not boycotting Cuba.

And according to the DSA, Cuba has a superior economic system to the U.S., an economic system that the DSA would like to implement here. In particular, the fossil-fuel-free energy system recently implemented in Cuba has been exactly what the DSA has long been advocating for the U.S.

Here is a post from NPR in 2019 reporting on Congresspeople’s AOC’s and Edward Markey’s release of their proposal for the Green New Deal. A few excerpts:

In very broad strokes, the Green New Deal legislation laid out by Ocasio-Cortez and Markey sets goals for some drastic measures to cut carbon emissions across the economy, from electricity generation to transportation to agriculture. In the process, it aims to create jobs and boost the economy. . . . Among the most prominent, the deal calls for “meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources.” The ultimate goal is to stop using fossil fuels entirely. . . .

In short, the Green New Deal proposal described exactly what Cuba has just done — “stop using fossil fuels entirely.” According to AOC and Markey, this would “create jobs and boost the economy.” Is there some reason that that is not occurring in Cuba?

The New York Sun has a piece from March 15 with the headline beginning “American Socialists To Join New Cuba Aid Flotilla . . .” (likely behind paywall). Excerpt:

The Democratic Socialists of America announced that 20 DSA members will join an international group of humanitarians, the so-called Nuestra América Convoy, which says it is delivering critical aid to Cuba amid an economic and energy crisis caused by America’s blockade of fuel, flights, and other essential supplies. . . . It has issued an open letter signed by celebrities like Jane Fonda, Mark Ruffalo, and Susan Sarandon, calling for the administration to “treat Cuba with equality and respect” and “let Cuba live.” . . . With 89 percent of Cubans reportedly living in poverty, the Communist regime has a chokehold on food and energy distribution.

What I’m not getting is why Cuba is in need of some kind of humanitarian aid. According to the DSA, Cuba has an economic system superior to ours, and which we should emulate. It has the ability to trade freely with countries representing 75% of the world economy in essentially all commodities other than oil which, as DSA has told us, is not needed and should be eliminated ASAP. If the Cubans are short of electricity at the moment, they have the complete ability to obtain wind turbines and solar panels from China to their hearts’ content. Won’t that solve the problem?

I guess it’s admirable of the DSA to stand up for their comrades in Cuba. But shouldn’t they have at least a little curiosity as to why Cuba can’t make carbon free electricity — let alone anything else in its economy — work? It’s hard to believe that morons at this level get elected to office in the U.S., but there you have it.